SAD CASE OF DROWNING.
HEROIC ATTEMPT AT RESCUE.
On Monday evening a melancholy case of drowning occurred at Newbury , the incident being the sadder from the fact that strenuous efforts to rescue the child were unsuccessful. It appears that about six o’clock, a small boy of eight summers named Frederick Smart was fishing from the wooden bridge which crosses the stream hard by the Conservative Club.
With a perversity that frequently attends the attempts of the juvenile angler, the line became detached from the rod and began floating away. Getting another and longer rod from a companion, he clambered on the railings of the bridge and in his endeavour to reach his first disappearing line he toppled over. His companion who was 10 years of age very properly raised an alarm and ran to the cottage of the lock-keeper but he was not at home.
Mr Munday, the Town Hall keeper, hearing the cry of distress came up, and at once got down the drag which is placed on the east side of Newbury bridge. Then the lock-keeper, who was at work in the adjoining house, came up and they both tried their hardest to reach the boy, but the drag was not long enough and was found too heavy for the quick manipulation. The body meanwhile had drifted over the other side of the river and was being carried by the current down the stream. The lock-keeper now went to fetch his long weed rake with which he was successful in reaching the body.
Meanwhile Mr Herbert Comyns had pluckily jumped into the river below the bridge and was swimming upstream but the current at this part is very strong and when he arrived at the place the boy had sunk Mr Comyns made several attempts to dive but owing to the strength of the current and weighted by his clothes he was unsuccessful, and by the time the weed rake had secured the body he was quite exhausted. The body was brought to shore and laid on some straw at the back of Mr Hawkins’ shop and PC Jones resorted to artificial respiration. These measures were continued by Drs. Douglas and Wyllie who shortly arrived on the spot. All these humane efforts were unfortunately without avail, the sp[ark of life was manifestly extinct and the dead body was taken to the mortuary on the police stretcher.
THE INQUEST
The inquest was held in the police court by the Borough Coroner, Dr Henry Watson JP, and jury of whom Mr Frederick Wise was chosen foreman.
School
The first witness was the father Frederick Smart who identified the body. He last saw his son on Monday dinner time when the lad was going to school.
Reginald Bartlett said he was fishing with Smart on Monday evening between five and six on the bridge close to the Conservative club. Smart’s line fell off the rod and so he took witness’s rod and tried to reach it but in doing so fell over the bridge. There was only another boy near at the time. Witness ran to the lock-keeper’s cottage but nobody was at home. Mr. Munday came up and got the drag and the lock-keeper also arrived.
John Ferris, the keeper at Newbury Lock, deposed that about five minutes to six on Monday evening he was working in the house formally occupied by the late Mr Osgood, and was told that there was somebody in the river. He ran out and saw Mr Munday the Town Hall keeper with the drag. This was not long enough so witness went for his weed rake but the body was still out of reach. He handed the rake over the wall to Mr Hawkins’ back place and went through the house and got there. The body could be seen at the bottom of the river and after one or two tries they got it, Mr. Comyns had jumped into the river below the bridge and swam upstream but was unable to get to the body and was quite done up. The body was taken into the back of Mr Hawkins’ shop and a doctor sent for.
Dr. Wyllie said that on Monday evening just before six he was sent for, and when he got to the place PC Jones was trying artificial respiration which he took over and alternately with Dr Douglas continued for about 20 minutes, but life was quite extinct. Death was caused by suffocation through drowning. A verdict to this effect was returned.
A USELESS DRAG
At the conclusion of the evidence the corner remarked that it was not a bit of good having a drag which was not long enough and the Lockkeeper said it was a very heavy and useless thing it was it wanted a longer pole and smaller irons that one would fetch a horse out of the river the corner said that the jury should make a representation to the council calling attention to the uselessness of the existing drag.
Mr. Munday, who was on the jury, said there ought to be a drag on the wall of the Conservative Club because that was the most awkward place. If the drag had been long enough he could have saved the boy. Another juror said that the rails on the bridge were not high enough.
The Coroner spoke in very high terms of Mr Comyns’ act. He thought it was a most plucky thing for him to jump into the river with his clothes on and they should command his conduct. The Coroner further promised to write to the Town Council saying that in the opinion of the jury a drag should be kept on the Conservative Club and be longer and lighter than the existing one.
The forman of the jury asked if they could inform the Royal Humane Society of Mr Comyns’ deed, and the Coroner said that the jury should write through the foreman, whereupon the inquest terminated.
|