Jump to: Birth Death Burial Newspaper Cuttings Biographies
Born: | |
Died: | |
Buried: | 14/02/1880 |
Listed below are all the details we have been able to find so far on William Westall.
As far as we are aware, all the information is correct. However, sometimes transcriptions can lead to errors being made. If you find any errors or omissions, please let us know and we will endeavour to get them corrected as soon as possible.
If you have any further information on William Westall, we would be delighted to hear from you.
There is no information in our database regarding the birth of William Westall.
Can you help us? If so, please contact our History Research Group.
There is no information in our database regarding the death of William Westall.
Can you help us? If so, please contact our History Research Group.
Name at death | William Westall | ||||||
Age at Death | 53 | ||||||
Burial Date | 14 February 1880 | ||||||
Abode |
Newbury |
||||||
Official at Burial | The Rev'd. A Herbert Stanton, Curate. | ||||||
Comments | |||||||
Burial Register Index |
|
||||||
Sources | Burial Register |
The articles below have been transcribed from newspapers and magezines.
Source: | Newbury Weekly News |
Article date: | 26/11/1869 |
Copyright: | Newbury Weekly News |
Transciption: | BEATING THE BOUNDS. The boundary of the parish at the Speenhamland end of the town runs between the premises of Messrs. Bundock and Scott and Mr. Henry Seymour; and the task of rendering this pretty clear to the spectators having been established, the work of following the boundary to the Marsh – which itself is not an easily accomplished task – was left to the man who was engaged specially for that purpose, and one or two of the more active of the officials, whilst the boys and the great body of the spectators were instructed to gain the Marsh by the nearest public footpath – namely, Parr’s-yard. Here, however, an obstruction existed. A chain extended across the yard about half-way down, and the gate at the bottom, abutting upon the Marsh, was securely locked, and a guard stationed there, who informed the crowd that the footpath was private and that if they insisted on a right of way, let them do it properly, and set the lawyers at work. The crowd, to whom the locked gate was particularly obnoxious, seemed to think it was too simple a case for the gentlemen of the long robe, and intimated pretty clearly the sort of treatment they would adopt. The keeper of the gate stuck to his post resolutely; but, changing his tactics, began to argue with the crowd. “You can see,” he said “this is not a public road; it is so narrow – why it’s no more than twenty inches wide.” The besiegers, however, failed to see the conclusiveness of the argument, that because a road is narrow, it must necessarily be private; and being in no disposition to parley, they averred, “Private or not we mean to have the gate down.” “If you pull this gate down,” retorted the staunch defender, you’ll have the house down.” Some wag in the crowd gave rather an ominous, but rough and ready answer, “Then if you wants to be safe, you had better come out of it pretty quick, because we means to have it down,” an observation which was received with ringing applause. Several officials now came up, but their coaxing and persuasion were to no purpose. A chisel was called for; but that being too small, a bar was demanded, which was triumphantly handed to the man deputed to carry out the work of destruction. The sight of the crowbar did what everything previously had failed to do, and the guardian of the gate and the protector of the private road, who had all along been inexorable, now relented at the sight of this formidable instrument, and promised to fetch the key, the gate being unlocked amid the derisive cheers of the spectators, who, if it had not been for the interposition of more law-abiding dispositions, would in all probability have made an attempt at removing the obnoxious gate. The defence of the Parr’s-yard gate, and its surrender in the interests of discretion rather than valour, formed one of the most exciting incidents of the day. The pent-up company of bound-beaters were now enabled, by the removal of the chain and the opening of the gate, to emerge into the Marsh. The parish boundary, however, runs at the back of Magdala-terrace, otherwise the borough limits are co-extensive with those of the Marsh on the north and east sides. Before proceeding, a word or two was said with reference to the turnstile and the width of the new road. From the outfall of the sewer to the hatch, the stream was traversed by Westall; and on arriving at the river Kennett, Mr. John Flint was kind enough to offer to convey across the Mayor and the Foreman of the Court Leet, and row for a punt to ferry across the remainder of the officials, leaving the hangers-on to go round by the bridge. The river was safely crossed; but the Foreman, owing to a hole on the bank, narrowly escaped immersion, being saved this catastrophe by the prompt assistance of one or two of his friends. The basin in the wharf had also to be crossed, and a short walk over piles of timber, and through a narrow defile of premises, led to Back-lane, and on through Mr. Skinner’s garden to St. Mary’s-hill, opposite the road to the station, several buildings having to be crossed by the way. The house adjoining the railway bridge was also entered by the lower window, the parties coming out by the side-door down the shrubbery, over the line, and across the wall into Mr. Graham’s garden. Here a halt was made and the jury entertained, refreshment also being provided for the followers and the boys. Thus invigorated, the boundary-beaters continued through East-fields, past the workhouse, and on to Monkey-lane, where a halt was made, and the names of the leet jury called. The misty rain which prevailed at the start had ceased, the clouds had rolled away, and the sun shone out brightly, making November appear almost as pleasant as May. This delightful change in the weather, and the forced pace at which the leaders of the party walked, had its effect in promoting physical circulation, and most seemed glad at the opportunity of breathing leisurely and wiping the perspiration from their brow. Those laden with overcoats expressed their regret at not having left them behind, but consoled themselves with lighting the fragrant weed, and indulging in mutual gratulation at having such a delightfully fine day. The lane was traversed nearly as far as Greenham-common, when the party abruptly deviated over the pailings into Sandleford-park, almost at the edge of which stands a boundary tree, against which the old-fashioned and never-to-be-forgotten practice of bumping the softest part of the boys’ bodies was observed, the victims of this interesting proceeding on the present occasion being James Pearce, George Parrott, Jesse Breeze, Frederic Smith, and Matthew Rosier. The boys were informed that now they had acquired their freedom, but in what this freedom consisted, or whether it merely meant an immunity from all such pains and penalties in the future, did not appear very clear. Several bystanders, as the ceremony was proceeding, recounted similar personal experiences as having occurred seven, 14 and 21 years ago – and in some instances the reminiscences were alleged to be of a painful nature, the “tender mercies” of a by-gone day, in this respect, being less considerate than the present. A little further stood another boundary tree on which was cut a cross. Close at hand was a retreat in which was disposed a portion of the old stone work which came from Newbury Church at its restoration, and among other objects of interest the old font was pointed out, which a gentleman thoughtfully apostrophised – “ Out of this font I was christened, and, I make no doubt, many others who are here to-day were also christened from it.” The whole was prettily arranged and planted with ferns. Three ponds were passed, namely, Higher-pond, Fish Garden-pond, and Brown’s-pond, - the latter of which was an ornamental piece of water well-known to skaters – one or two more trees notched, and after a circuitous walk leaving the Priory at some distance, Newtown water was reached, where Mr. Withers was waiting with an abundant supply of bread and cheese and beer, and milk for the boys, the whole of which in due time was demolished, and then, in observance of another old practice, the 100th Psalm was sung to the Old Hundredth tune, Mr. Packer announcing the hymn in true clerkly style, and pitching the tune as correctly as any accomplished precentor. Cheers were given at the close, which though they seemed somewhat incongruous were, we were assured, strictly according to usage. They served at least one purpose of giving a turn to those who might have been unable to sing. While halting there old Stephen Justice, who is 74 years of age, told us it was the seventh time he had been round with the beaters, and that he came to-day as he said it would probably be his last opportunity. While these proceedings were progressing a bevy of damsels were standing looking on with some amount of interest. On the party begining to move they prudently retired, all except one who continued to remain in the direction which the “beaters” took. The opportunity to one of the officials who was in advance of the party was too tempting to be “unimproved,” and as he passed performed an act of salutation to which the maiden, though she looked coyish and hastened to join her companions, did not indicate any sign of displeasure. The interesting incident occurred so momentary and apparently without premeditation that only two or three were the privileged spectators. The parish bounds for the next couple of miles lay in the direction of Wash-water, the water course being adhered to all the way. Mr. Beech’s gardens were scarcely passed through than the hangers on of the party began to exhibit a little rough play. One of the blue boys namedLawrencewas the first to get what was familiarly called a “ducking.” The road for some distance lay through what we heard called the “Leashes,” a coppice of tall underwood, and in addition to the difficulty of engineering one’s way between the brambles there existed the peril of being quietly pushed into the stream. Several narrow escapes have to be recorded. A brushmaker, whose name, however, we forbear giving, came to grief just before reaching Wash-water, getting as thorough an immersion as it was possible. It may be some satisfaction to him, however, to know that his persecutor, a blacksmith, got a damping subsequently as he was stepping into a boat at Northcroft, and as he was a heavy man it was nearly as much as the two persons in the boat could manage to fish him out. A certain amount of license seems to be claimed on these occasions, for the position of a Court Leet official was not sufficient to deter an attempt at immersion, policemen were also threatened with a cold bath, and a conspiracy was in existence to perpetrate a similar indignity upon a representative of the press. We are glad, personally and for other reasons, that these attempts proved abortive. The whole course of the stream from Newtown was walked by Westall through the water, and in one or two instances where a piece of cover formed an island, the boundaries were always determined by walking the outer portion of the stream, and including everything within the borough. At Wash-water the man swam under the bridge, from which point the course lay across some arable fields (formerly open common), along the edge of a coppice, and through a lane to Bunker’s-hill otherwise Burial-hill, so called from tradition appointing it as the place were [sic] the slain at the battle of Newbury were buried. It is an artificial elevation and stands on the boundary of the parish. According to practice provision was here made for a second distribution of bread and cheese and beer, and the band standing on the hill played the “National Anthem.” The ancient custom was, however, to sing the 104th Psalm, but this has been abandoned of late years. The Court Leet and officials then proceeded to the “Gun,” where a spread awaited them, the Foreman assigning as a reason that it would not do on these occasions to rely altogether onProvidence. Whilst staying here a diversion was raised against one named Johnson, a notorious character, who was accused of taking bread and cheese away from some of the boys and striking a man with a stick on the head when it was mentioned to him. The police were obliged to interpose, and Johnson, to avoid the violence of the crowd, ran for shelter into a cottage, but they succeeded in driving him from this, and threatened to throw him into the pond, into which, however, he prefered to run for protection, and whilst standing in it they splashed the water over him with their sticks. A second time he was rescued from his tormentors, and was then sent on to Newbury, whilst the Leet Jury and their attendants returned to finish their task, taking the footpath over the fields, and coming out on the road against Enborne-farm, skirting the Bone-mill, crossing the railway and straight, as the crow flies, to the canal, where a boat and a punt, were in waiting, the latter, as it was being pulled across from the opposite side, was made to strike the bank with force, every one on board being thrown down, to their own great danger. Of course the occurrence was not without design on the part of those pulling the ropes. Mr. Smith’s fields were now traversed as far as where the boundary of Northcroft abuts upon the old river, which was crossed; and it was here that the blacksmith came to grief. The stream around Northcroft was traversed, passing the site of the proposed bathing-house, on through the lower part of Goldwell and the gardens which extend to the George and Dragon, reaching the spot from whence the start was made in the morning. The people who followed emerged at the back of the Wesleyan Chapel, joining the already large concourse which had assembled at Speenhamland to salute the boundary-beaters. A procession was then formed – the band first, followed by the flag (borne by Henry Cullum, who had carried the same throughout the day), the Mayor, Court Leet, and officials, and a large number of persons, who cheered and manifested an enthusiasm which is rarely witnessed in Newbury. The band stopped to play before the Mayor’s residence and that of the Foreman, and from thence to the Market-place, where the Foreman of the Court Leet addressed a few words. Cheers were given, and the assembly dispersed quietly and in good order. So far ended a public event which, occurring only once in seven years, carries with it some amount of importance. The Court Leet subsequently dined together at the Dolphin |
This obituary entry is awaiting verification. |
Source: | NWN |
Article date: | 12/02/1880 |
Copyright: | |
Transciption: | Westall - February 9 at marsh St, Newbury, William Westall aged 53 |
This obituary entry is awaiting verification. |
Source: | Reading Mercury |
Article date: | 20/11/1869 |
Copyright: | |
Transciption: |
NEWBURY HERALD [Coat of Arms] |
This obituary entry is awaiting verification. |
The articles below contain information about William Westall.
William Westall C1825-1880 And Mary Ann Westall C1821-1883
William and Mary Ann Westall were living at Jack Street, Newbury, in 1871: William's occupation 'Joumeyman Painter’ having evolved from a seemingly 'jack of all trades' recorded elsewhere variously Bricklayer Journeyman, Bargeman, Plumber's or General Labourer, until finally House Painter on his Death Certificate: lnformant Francis Westall, son.
William was baptized 18th January 1826 at Newbury St Nicolas, a son of William Westall and Sarah Lewis, who were married there on 16th May 1820. His father, a bargeman, died aged 39 on 17th April 1840 at Cheap Street, and his mother Sarah converted to the Church of Latter-day Saints in 1844, followed in 1846 by her married daughter, Mary Ann Canning and son-in-law George Canning, and in 1849 sons William Westall and his elder brother Francis. The LDS Register of Members records that William conducted a baptism as an Elder in 1851, whilst Francis was a Teacher at Reading.
At Newbury St Nicolas on 5th October 1851 William Westall married Mary Ann Green, also a convert to LDS in 1849, the daughter of Thomas and Elizabeth Green, Shoemaker/Bootmaker of Speen. Mary
Ann Green was baptized 21st May 1821 at Froxfield, Wilts.
From newspaper reports in the Reading Mercury it is evident that in 1862 William Westall was an employee of Samuel Biddis; in November 1869 he performed the physical part of the ceremony of 'Beating the Bounds' of Newbury Borough; and in 1876 he was also a member of the local Fire Brigade.
(The Newbury Weekly News of 26th November 1869 holds a fascinating full account of the 'Beating the Bounds' ceremony, which was performed every seven years.)
Wlliam Westall died 9th February 1880 aged 53 [sic] at Marsh Street and his widow's death at age 68 [sic] at Northbrook Place was recorded in the LDS register in 1883: Mary Ann Westhall [sic] 'dead in full faith of the gospel on Friday December 6th 1883 at 4.30 am'. (Friday was actually December 7th as recorded on her death certificate: lnformant F.Westall, son.) Their burials were recorded in the registers for Newbury St Nicolas Parish and Newtown Road Cemetery on 12th February 1880 and 11th December 1883 respectively.
The couple raised two sons of the marriage to maturity: Francis Maroni born 23th January 1852 at Speen and Henry supposedly born 20th March 1859 at Speen, according to his Birth Certificate, but baptized there on 14th March and recorded 'Bless'd & Named' in the LDS register on 21.10.1860 with a birth date 13.3.1859. They also suffered several infant child mortalities but the actual whereabouts of all the children's burials is unknown as those recorded in the St Nicolas PR appear after the churchyard was closed to burials, other than in existing family vaults or brick graves, and the St Mary Speen Register is illegible in parts due to water damage:
20 Feb 1857 John Thomas Westall, 3 yrs, Speen, St Mary the Virgin - born Newbury 07 Sep 1853 - baptized 13 Feb 1857 at Speen the day before he died.
1858 Clara Elizabeth Westall,1 yr, born 26 May 1857 Speenhamland, Speen and died there 16 May 1858.
1865 Clara Westall bap 12 Jan 1865 Newbury, St Nicolas, [P & D in Baptisms PR margin]. Birth cert: born Jack Yard, Newbury at 7 a.m. same day. Unnamed female twin reg'n in GRO index.
19 Mar 1868 Fanny Westall. 6 yrs Newbury, St Nicolas. Died 15th at Jack Yard.
Sarah Westall, William's widowed mother, had emigrated to USA in 1853, with a party of Mormons from Newbury on the Utah trail, and Joined her daughter Mary Ann Canning and family at Council Bluffs, Pottawattamie Co., lowa; their residence the last 'sighting' for Sarah in the 1856 lowa Census. She was recorded Sarah Westhall [sic] (LDS transcription 'Westfall') aged 50 for her passage on 7th March 1853 on the Ellen Maria: Liverpool/New Orleans bound for Salt Lake with almost 350 other souls.
The burials for Mary Ann Canning and husband George are recorded at Walnut Cemetery, Council Bluffs, in 1896 and 1898 respectively. The resting place for Sarah Westall is untraced but she is mentioned as a widow ‘Sister Westall' and identified by her Canning family links in a history written in 1878 by Thomas Tanner of Tooele City, an emigrant from Newbury who was born 1807 and ordained High Priest in the Church of Latter-day Saints in 1864.
The burial of Thomas Green of Speenhamland, William Westall's father-in-law, was recorded at St Mary Speen on 2d December 1863 aged 65. However, there is no obvious record for the death of his widow Elizabeth in the GRO index. The BFHS burials index offers two possibilities, both quoting the same burial date but with conflicting ages, the latter being the most likely:
05 Jan 1878 GREEN, Elizabeth 72 of Newbury Newtown Rd Cemetery
05 Jan 1878 GREEN , Elizabeth 78 of St John, St John the Evangelist Church Almshouses
Author: Dorothy Jones
© Dorothy Jones
*The FNRC believe that the certificates published on this page have been added in compliance with the rules laid down by the General Register Office (GRO). Click here for more information.
If you believe that we may have inadvertently breached the privacy of a living person by publishing any document, please contact us so we can immediately remove the certificate and investigate further.
Thank you.
FNRC.
© 2010-2023. Friends of Newtown Road Cemetery, unless otherwise stated.
Web site designed by Paul Thompson
The Friends of Newtown Road Cemetery is a not-for-profit organisation that works in association with Newbury Town Council to look after and maintain Newtown Road Cemetery for the benefit of the people of Newbury.